A Plug for Proper Direct Marketing

I sign up for a lot of things to check them out, so I’m on a ton of mailing lists.  I’m not complaining, because it certainly doesn’t take me very long to zap through my inbox and delete 25 emails from Shutterfly, Expedia, Orbitz, Travelocity, Art.com, etc… who obviously have a spreadsheet that says, "If we send 1 million emails per week, 10,000 people will open them and 100 will buy something."  Such is the world of anonymously blasting your email base.

But today I got an email from the folks at Lumosity, a "brain games" site I wrote briefly about a few months back.  I had forgotten about them.  They sit in my favorites bar, but the link is dusty from lack of use.  So getting an email from them was an actual pleasure.  I *wanted* to read that email because I had forgotten about them. And they had new things to tell me, so I appreciated hearing them. 

So here’s a lesson to take from everyday life and apply to Direct Marketing. "Don’t talk unless you have something to say."  After all, it’s free to talk too, but you rarely see people coming up out of the blue to start a conversation about nothing with you.  And "Special 20% off sale" is not something to say. "New package discounts to Fiji" does not count as something to say either.  Lumosity’s message was, "You joined our beta program, now we have new games for your brain, do you want to check them out?" That counts as news in my book.  Now if they hit me every week about their newest game, they’ll go in the "Annoying yet not Spam category."  But for now, they get a plug.

Targeting the Young (and Single?) Voter

Young crowds, a charasmatic performer, a lot of hype, affluent people – it has all the makings of an event or concert designed to drive single people to a bar or show. 

But this is not a bar promotion, it’s a polical event.

If you believe the New York Daily News, there are more than a few undertones from the Barack Obama campaign team that Obama rallies have become the new *it* scene for young single people tired of the bar scene, office romance or match.com.

According to the article, "Like-minded city singles are looking to tonight’s Barack Obama fund-raiser as more than just a politically charged soiree: It’ll be a raging pickup scene."

With a web site featuring social networking (complete with photos), events that seem to purposely weed out the old and stodgy, and a candidate that can almost be described as "hip and cool," it’s hard to think this is an accident.  It seems like the campaign team developed a smart strategy of, "Smart single people don’t have a great outlet for meeting other smart single people.  Let’s have our campaign be their meeting place." 

If it works, it won’t be the first time someone used sex to sell a product, but it might be the first time it was done for a political campaign.

Things To Expect When You Do A Satellite TV Interview

So, I thought I’d throw a few tips out there for any of you about to do a satellite TV interview.  This is all based on the half hour I spent yesterday, shooting at KCPQ 13 in Seattle for a interview with Orlando TV station WOFL Fox 35.

1) You might expect that they will take you to a closed door studio, where you have plenty of privacy in order to make you feel more comfortable and less nervous.  Not so much.  Plan on having a camera and a backdrop situated in the middle of a bustling newsroom, where no one is actually paying attention to you, but they all can hear every word you say.

2) I brought about 7 shirts, 4 ties and 3 jackets so that I could get advice on the best color combo.  Don’t expect much more than, "Don’t wear white," and "I like the blue one." 

3) There will be a camera pointing at you, and a monitor as well, so you will be tempted to use this monitor as a mirror, since you can see yourself.  Except, it’s not a mirror, it’s a monitor, so everything is in reverse.  If your tie is off a little to the right in the monitor, and you do the natural thing and move it to the left, all you have done is basically take your tie halfway off your neck.  So now you must start over.   

4) Most importantly, when you are there to shoot in a 15 minute "window," if it is running late, start figuring out who needs to get something fixed.  Our window got cut short because we started late due to a technical issue that each station thought the other one was fixing.  So, just be aware that 15 minutes means 15 minutes, but only if you start on time.

5) Don’t fidget.  I haven’t seen the tape yet, but apparently I slowly drifted my chair a few inches to the right every minute or so.  So by the end of the shoot I had drifted pretty significantly off center.  It probably won’t be noticed, but try to sit still.

6) It’s a little weird when you can’t see the guy asking the questions but he can see you.  But not nearly as weird as the realization that you are talking to a camera pointed at Orlando, and even though they can all hear youir answers, no one else in the Seattle newsroom klnows what you are being asked.

7) Prepare an opening answer, and nail it.  Then, no matter what the first question is, answer it with your opening statement.  That makes sure all your talking points get across.  If they need to, they’ll go back and edit the question so it sounds more relevant, but chance are they won’t even notice. 

Ok, so now I’m officially a media consultant.  I’ll fire up the WOFL-TV url when the story gets posted.  Thanks to WOFL-TV anchor and old friend Cale Ramaker for the chance to embarass myself, I mean promote MyElectionChoices.com. 

Whoops Marketing, or “Watch Your Acronyms”

Seattle just got a Trolley.  Excellent news.  The Trolley will run down South Lake Union. And so imagine the guy painting the acronym on the side of car.  Bay Area Rapid Transit = "Bart";  South Lake Union Trolley =

Uh oh.  "Uh boss, can I ask you a quick question?"

So now we have a street car instead.  SLUSC.  Not really much better….. If it was shortened to Lake Union Street Car (LUSC), you could pronounce it "Lucy." Any other ideas?

User Experience Vs Revenue in a Socially Networked World

So, once you take out porn and gambling, no Intenet industry is as profoitable as Fantasy Sports.  In fact, you can make a pretty legitimate argument that no industry was helped by the Internet more than Fantasy Sports Leagues.  I mean, people were always going to buy books, and go to garage sales, but were they really going to drop $100 on Fantasy Football?

So now all the major sports players have built established fantasy leagues, and it’s interesting how it’s evolved.  Since people play in multiple leagues with different groups of friends, and different league "commissioners" who set the whole thing up, there’s not really an easy way to establish brand loyalty.  I’m going to choose to play in whatever league my friend Matt sets up, not Yahoo or Sportsline.

But immediately, people can email friends about who i shaving a better experience.  Some sites, like Sportsline, give away everythng for free, including real time scoring.  I will happily recommend Sportsline to my friends.  But over at Yahoo, they want to charge a few bucks for everything.  The user functionality is such that my Sportsline league gets more attention.

How do you balance this as a Product Manager?  Do you chase down more transaction revenue, like Yahoo, or do you give away the store and have more ads and sponsored content areas, like Sportsline.  (I can’t remember what ESPN does.) 

So from a marketing perspective how do you decide?  Is Fantasy Sports a commodity that is simply best for generating eyeballs and sticky customers?  Or is a powerful transactional revenue driver? 

 

 

Shock and Awe Marketing

It’s easy to talk a good game.  But there’s proof when you point to something you did and say, "Yeah, that was me."

This link is not a new site, nor is it a new company, but it dawned on me this week that the most powerful marketing is proof of concept.  So I think this is the benchmark.  If your web site proves what you can do better than what the folks at Zaaz.com have proved they can do, then you have achieved something noteworthy. 

400 Fans Watch End of Major League Game

marlins.jpgThis seems unbelievable, but an estimated 400 fans managed to see the end of a Major League Baseball Game Tuesday afternoon.  Nationals vs Marlins in Miami.

By the way, the stadium seats 75,000.

So if you came to the game, by the end, you roughly had 200 seats between you and the closest fan.  It’s like baseball’s version of Alaska.

The funny part is, if you built a marketing campaign, and told everyone not to stay until the last inning, you couldn’t get that high of a conversion rate.  True, only 10,000 fans were there for the beginning, but you’re still talking about 96% of the crowd bolting.

Fine, 90 degrees, 100% humidity – but isn’t Miami like that every day?  Fine, last place teams, but with teh exceptions of 2 seasons, aren’t the Marlins always last? 

So let’s throw one more plug out there for the English Premier League.  Granted, only 4 teams have a chance at winning it, and that’s not perfect by any means.  But every year the worst 3 teams get demoted.  You tell me there isn’t a reason to attend a September baseball game, if some team is going to be stuck spending 2008 playing against Tacoma, Sacramento and Fresno?  Tell me Florida, Tampa Bay and Kansas City fans
wouldn’t see value in attending a Spetember game knowing it could be the last time they see Major League Baseball for awhile.

The Battle of Shareholder Value vs Environmental Concern

So back in the 90’s, it started becoming en vogue for Corporations to donate profits to charitable organizations.  This started a very interesting debate about whether companies should simply deliver value to their shareholders, or be responsible for bettering the communities in which they belong.

An easy argument was to drop the charitable giving money into the overall Marketing budget and call it "Community Relations."  If a giant bank sponsors runs for Leukemia and Breast Cancer research, then one could argue the CPM was worth the donation.  It’s a pretty compelling argument that you can get a lot of community goodwill on your side, which then helps with non-tangibles such as recruiting, brand management and corporate morale.

Fast forward to 2007, and the magic bullet is in going "Green." Companies are denting their bottom line to use recycled paper, advanced heating and cooling systems, subsidizing public transportation for employees and other efforts.  And shareholders seem to be ok with that.

But what about Google’s latest announcement.   According to a Google release, "Google.org is committed to finding innovative transportation solutions to reduce greenhouse gas emissions that cause global warming…As part of this initiative, we are issuing a $10 million request for investment proposals (RFP). We plan to invest amounts ranging from $500,000 to $2,000,000 in selected for-profit companies whose innovative approach, team and technologies will enable widespread commercialization of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles, electric vehicles and/or vehicle-to-grid solutions."

Now, you can look at this 3 ways:

1) Google makes $10 million in an hour, so it’s irrelevant to shareholders.  Great PR move.

2) This is a completely for profit effort for Google, stemming from their M+A group, and Google Shareholders should benefit down the road.

3) This $10 Million is nice, but why is an online search and media company investing in Transportation, something they could not possible know anything about?  Shareholders should be annoyed.

On a lighter note, what happens if Google ends up building the killer transportation app?  Will everyone be commuting to the Microsoft campus on the Google Mobile?

 

How to Turn 15 Seconds of Humiliation into 15 Minutes of Fame

In the most dramatic public relations turnaround one could image from a teenager, I thought Miss Teen South Carolina showed a lot of poise in her national comeback at the MTV Video Music Awards.  The clip of her making fun of herself is found here at Buzznet.

I don’t see how anyone can say anythng mean about her ever again.  After all, she got invited to the VMA’s, and we did not, so good for her making something positive out of a complete disaster.